{
 "experiment": "probability_flux_probe",
 "band_L": 24,
 "k": 2,
 "m": 20,
 "EXPLORATORY": true,
 "TQA_trap": {
  "n": 817,
  "Q_frob": 0.2577,
  "rho_Q_current_ratio": 0.1768,
  "rho_Q_CI95": [
   0.1629,
   0.1823
  ],
  "propagator_radius": 0.776
 },
 "GSM8K_reasoning": {
  "n": 6000,
  "Q_frob": 0.3162,
  "rho_Q_current_ratio": 0.2732,
  "rho_Q_CI95": [
   0.2619,
   0.2834
  ],
  "propagator_radius": 0.949
 },
 "rho_Q_CIs_separated": true,
 "flux_higher_in_reasoning": true,
 "VERDICT": "READING B (provisional): the probability-current ratio rho_Q is HIGHER in GSM8K-reasoning (0.273 CI(0.2619, 0.2834)) than TQA-traps (0.177 CI(0.1629, 0.1823)) with NON-OVERLAPPING CIs -> the non-equilibrium flux magnitude varies with cognitive regime = thermodynamic signature of computation, not generic background. Owes: within-GSM8K hard-vs-easy + correct-vs-wrong stratification, length/depth controls, independent review. EXPLORATORY."
}